Русские видео

Сейчас в тренде

Иностранные видео


Скачать с ютуб Canada Startup Visa – BEST TYPE of DESIGNATED ORGANIZATION P1. – Canada Immigration в хорошем качестве

Canada Startup Visa – BEST TYPE of DESIGNATED ORGANIZATION P1. – Canada Immigration 5 месяцев назад


Если кнопки скачивания не загрузились НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса savevideohd.ru



Canada Startup Visa – BEST TYPE of DESIGNATED ORGANIZATION P1. – Canada Immigration

Choosing the right designated organization is crucial for your Canada Startup Visa journey! In this first part of the video, join us as we compare Ventures, Angel Investors, and Incubators. Stay tuned for the second part, where we'll continue guiding you on making informed choices to set your startup on the path to success!   If you are trying to make up your mind about applying to the Canada Startup Visa Program, look no further. That’s our specialty here at INGWE Canada. We will guide and support you throughout the endorsement letter or Letter of Support process and the entire immigration process including work visas and permanent residencies. Get a FREE email assessment: https://bit.ly/InDirectEN 📤FREE assessment link https://bit.ly/InDirectEN 🗣️Book a personalized consultation https://www.ingwe.ca/store 📧Send us an email [email protected] 🔗Our website https://www.ingwe.ca/ 💼Follow us on LinkedIn   / ingwecanada   👥Follow us on Facebook   / ingweca   🖼️Follow us on Instagram   /       #canadastartupvisa #canadaimmigration #canadapr   Disclaimer: 1. This video was created in January 2023. The information provided in these images is valid to this date and it is at all times subject to change. As immigration policies and criteria update often, please contact us for the most current immigration programs or subscribe to receive the most recent immigration news.   2. Free assessments will be given through email to those who meet our internal eligibility criteria.

Comments