Скачать с ютуб ARTICLE 370 |J & K | Supreme Court Live Hearing I CJI Chandrachud I Adv. Warisha Farasati | Day 10 в хорошем качестве

ARTICLE 370 |J & K | Supreme Court Live Hearing I CJI Chandrachud I Adv. Warisha Farasati | Day 10

►अपनी क़ानूनी समस्या को 1 कॉल पर अभी सॉल्व करे (Legal Opinion) Whats App- https://wa.me/message/CNF4QLGUA6CNE1 Consult with Legal Shots Experts ► https://www.aapkaconsultant.com/legal... Consult with Legal Expert Adv. Naman Mohnot ► https://www.aapkaconsultant.com/advoc... ______________________ ►हमारे बनाये गए Legal Courses से जागरूक बने, Click here https://learn.lpt.institute/courses/L... _________________________ ►Description Advocate Warisha Farasat contended before the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court that political leaders, including three former Chief Ministers, who represented the will of the people of Jammu & Kashmir, were put under detention between August 5 and 6 in 2019, when Article 370 was abrogated by the Centre. "... three former Chief Ministers were in detention and these are all facts. Three former CMs and most of the (members of) legislative assembly - the will of the people - were in some form of detention, either under the Public Safety Act or under 107 or 151 (of the criminal procedure). It is laughable," she said while arguing before the Constitution Bench hearing pleas challenging the abrogation of Article 370. Farasat argued that the entire polity and all of the politicians, who extended support against the abrogation, were also put under detention. She said that the Centre’s move to nullify Article 370 is hit by malice in law. Farasat said that India is a “holding together” type of federalism, however, J&K represented a “coming together” federation as previously sovereign polities pooled their sovereignties to come together, while referring to the Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution which defines their federalism. She emphasized that under the Indian Constitution, various forms of federalism units exist like Union Territory, Union Territory with legislative powers like Delhi, and a state like Jammu & Kashmir with its own Constitution. “It is unique, but a normal part of federalism,” she added. She said that the framers of the Constitution were aware of the fact that the “constituent assembly” of J&K would finish its functions and may be no longer, adding that to apply changes procedure was contained under clause (1) of Article 370. Disclaimer:- This video has been made from the Live Hearing of the Supreme Court which is available on the Official YouTube channel of the Supreme Court of India. _________________________ ► Related Videos Future of Indian Judiciary- CJI Chandrachud Speech-    • Future of Indian Judiciary- CJI Chand...   How Much Junior Lawyers Should be Paid by Seniors: CJI Chandrachud-    • How Much Junior Lawyers should be Pai...   Practical Experience of CJI Chandrachud-    • Practical Experience of CJI Chandrachud   J & K I ARTICLE 370 I Supreme Court Live Hearing I Kapil Sibbal I CJI Chandrachud Bench I Day 2-   • J & K I ARTICLE 370 I Supreme Court L...   ARTICLE 370 I Supreme Court Live Hearing I Kapil Sibbal I CJI Chandrachud Bench-    • ARTICLE 370 I Supreme Court Live Hear...   _________________________ ►Contact us What's App ► +91 9251660907 Reach out ► https://www.aapkaconsultant.com/legal... _________________________ ►Follow Us Website ► https://thelegalshots.com/ Facebook ►   / thelegalshots   Instagram ►   / legal_shots   Linkedin ►   / legalshots   _________________________ #legalshots #supremecourt #livehearing #article370 #jammukashmir #lawyer