Скачать с ютуб AR15-Obsessed Dork Debunks Wendigoon's AR15 Video в хорошем качестве

AR15-Obsessed Dork Debunks Wendigoon's AR15 Video

I put together my response to Wendigoon's AR15 history video, which I believe gets a lot wrong - including it's central thesis. TLDW, the Army did stall and obstruct the AR15's adoption, but they had good reasons to do so. DOD rushed the adoption of the rifle, and the had good reasons to do so. The rifle did have problems early on as all rifles do. However, these happenings do not support a narrative of "sabotage", and really don't even paint a cohesive picture of negligence. I use the M16 Review Panel's report and The Black Rifle to break down the thesis, and show why the evidence Wendigoon presents for this thesis falls into one of two buckets: either misunderstanding the details to the point of being wrong, or being outright wrong. Links to these documents: https://odysee.com/THE_BLACK_RIFLE_M1... https://thecoltar15resource.com/repor... Long story short, I felt compelled to make this response because I've spent enough time researching this stuff that I feel obliged to fight the spread of this sort of fuddlore misunderstanding of the AR15's history as much as possible. Hopefully, the video strikes you as going beyond simply nitpicking small details (I made that video too, it was four hours long,, you can watch it here:    • The Rat Cut  ), and instead feels like an address of the core misunderstanding found in Wendigoon's presentation. A little more context/thoughts that didn't make it into the video are listed here: https://x.com/NaviGoBoom/status/18089...