Скачать с ютуб Epson HC 3800 VS Optoma UHD50x Motion Blur Test в хорошем качестве

Epson HC 3800 VS Optoma UHD50x Motion Blur Test

Optoma on left Epson on right Adding this as someone asked me a very good first question Ask yourself some basic questions before buying: 1. What are you using the projector as for the next two years? If this is a dedicated gaming rig, you may want a machine more like the Optoma because it's a bit sharper overall, although even in this image if you look at the left you see that the grass is "exaggerated" ...So if you are someone who is more interested in all around Cinema & Gaming and maybe some of this bleeding edge gaming tech is sacrificed for "overall home theater use" ...You're probably better off with the Epson. 2. How "dark-out-able" is your living room? Can you control that extremely well? If you do not have really good control over that, you may need to look elsewhere than single-chip DLP in general. The "white wheel" sacrifices your color depth... that or you trade its daylight giving powers for better colors. You can't have both at the same time so you need to program custom modes and you need a machine that solidly holds these programming settings. It can have glitches too. I found the 3 chip design in general superior in this regard as it did not wash the colors out even with my windows open during the day. I was very impressed by that. 3. Where is it getting placed? Most projectors offer something called "lens throw" which equates to knobs that you can turn to change the picture's position on the wall. The epson has both vertical and horizontal adjustments that keep the picture square but allow you to put the projector basically anywhere in the room. The Optoma offers this too but my finding was that it turned out to be only vertical and only ~10 degrees or so which meant that I had to spend another $100 for even longer HDMI cables and a ceiling mount, so it was hidden cost and labor I didn't expect. 4. How good are the "controls"? I imagine most of you peeps like me are ditching your 65" 4k TV's from many years ago now because we can suddenly get $1500 "4k" projectors To me that means it has to 100% be like a TV in that the remote needs to be modern and all the other HDMI cool stuff needs to work in tandem with it. I found that remote on the Epson to have a very nice dull amber glow for night use which didn't disrupt my vision and looked and felt like a big old-school Mitsubishi TV remote from the 90s... but in a good way. All the menus made it super easy to tune the picture within 2-3 days. The Optoma had some really good menus too for tuning the picture but there were things I didn't like. Things like the menu times out after 5 seconds so if you are "pixel peeping" and tuning your picture it makes the process laborious to constantly hustle the software and re-enter the menus. The remote is much smaller and is white and looks like a business projector remote. It does light up but the light is extremely bright white which I have to shield my face from at night or else it messes with my night vision. Another big thing it turned out was the importance of CEC, which basically meant that when I plugged the Epson in and hit the On button on my remote, my Marantz tuner lights up, tunes to input 4 and turns on the playstation pro to home screen... automatically and I did nothing to set it up. All of the machines just did their magic on their own like elves and it was so cool to see that happen for the first time. The Optoma just does not have this. 5. Again if you are a hardcore gamer, ask yourself "How important is a dedicated gaming setup?" The UHD50x really does offer the best refresh rate at 1080p 240hz so if you are motion sensitive or have a really good rig, this is probably really important. It offers the best pixel count too. The Epson is only "double HD" and the Japanese make no rush to try and hide this. Your max refresh rate is also 60hz. You have to trade off with the UHD50x between 4k but with either a softened pic quality or with some input lag, or 1080p at the most blistering refresh rate man has ever seen. The Epson actually lands for me in the middle of this with ~26ms input lag, an image that trades the physically highest image count for drastically increased color and contrast, decent proof that LCD tech has advanced and motion control is way better than it was 10 years ago, plus some other accouterments like the remote, HDMI stuff, lens shift, daytime usability. I may end up keeping both though. It's a tie in my eyes because one is just a hair better for gaming and one is just a hair better for movies :)